Why Measure Chlorine in Vacuum Gas Oil (VGO) and Very Low Sulfur Fuel Oil (VLSFO)?
Vacuum gas oil, more commonly referred to as VGO, is primarily used as a feed for cracking units such as the fluid catalyst cracker (FCC) or the hydrocracker. The FCC and hydrocracking units transform VGO into more desirable products – specifically, gasoline and gasoil (diesel). While VGO is worth more as a feedstock for producing these higher-value fuels, another potential – but uncommon – use for VGO is to blend it into residual fuel oil.
Since VGO is most likely to be used as a feedstock, it is paramount to measure and control its chlorine content. Higher chlorine content in feedstocks will impair and diminish catalyst performance by deactivating the catalyst more rapidly than it would in the absence of chlorine. In addition, chlorine in VGO feedstock can be transformed into hydrochloric acid (HCl), which causes corrosion damage, leading to repair needs, in turn causing an increase in both downtime and turnaround time.
Very low sulfur fuel oil, commonly abbreviated to VLSFO, is mainly used as a marine fuel and is compliant with the new 2020 International Maritime Organization (IMO) regulations for marine fuels. For VLSFO, accurate chlorine determination is important for storage reasons: VLSFO is stored in shore tanks and on ships in bunker tanks. These tanks hold the fuel for varying amounts of times and are connected to hoses, pipelines, manifolds, and other pipes or tubes that connect the ship to shore. Because chlorine is an oxidizer and high levels of chlorine can accelerate chloride corrosion of stainless steel, as with VGO, the ramifications of having elevated chlorine levels are not ideal.
In short, chlorine content in VGO and VLSFO is measured so that it can ultimately be reduced or adjusted to prevent catalyst deactivation, corrosion damage, and unwanted reactions with free radicals during chemical processes. Each of the aforementioned items lead to increased operating costs, increased maintenance hours, and a reduction in the amount of time between turnarounds.
Microcoulometry
Traditionally, when the chlorine levels in VGO and VLSFO are analyzed, this is done by using microcoulometry. Microcoulometry is a well-accepted method to determine chloride and/or organic halogens in petroleum products, and while this is certainly a good technique for analyzing the chloride or halogen content, there are some drawbacks – mainly: 1) these samples cannot be analyzed directly, and 2) they have to be diluted from either 5-times dilution or 20-times dilution, with heavier fractions needing to be diluted even further. Diluting samples often leads to error, leading to different values from those expected. Additionally, if a sample isn’t properly diluted, incomplete combustion occurs, fouling the unit and rendering it inoperable until it’s been cleaned or the fouled parts have been replaced.
Other microcoulometry methods may require the sample be refluxed with xylene, water, and a nitric acid solution for 15 minutes or more – then, the flask must be allowed to cool, and the organic and inorganic layers must separate. It is only after all of this that the analysis can begin.
Ultimately, microcoulometry, though effective at providing accurate chloride analysis, is a time-intensive process that requires gasses, acids (sulfuric acid, acetic acid, and nitric acid – the latter of which is only for extraction purposes), continuous observation and maintenance with regards to the liquid volumes in the reaction vat and scrubber, and a combustion tube at roughly 1000°C. Due to these drawbacks and the safety concerns of working with both acids and extremely high temperatures, a growing number of labs and refineries are moving away from combustion techniques and solutions that require extra sample preparation, and are instead seeking safer alternatives for obtaining fast, accurate, and reliable solutions for measuring chlorine in petroleum fuels.
Luckily, such an alternative exists in the form of Monochromatic Wavelength Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (MWDXRF), a variation of standard XRF that requires minimal sample preparation without the use of gasses or acids, delivering precise results within five minutes.
Product Highlight: Clora 2XP
Analyze Total Chlorine with Unmatched Analytical Performance
Easier to use than ever, Clora 2XP analyzes total chlorine in liquid hydrocarbons such as aromatics, distillates, heavy fuels, and crude oils, as well as aqueous solutions, while automatically correcting for sulfur interference. The enhanced precision and performance technology makes it the ideal choice for testing related to catalyst poisoning in reformers or for sites with fluid catalytic crackers and hydrocrackers monitoring very low chlorine levels.
Experiment
XOS performed the following experiment to showcase the precision and reliability of MWDXRF using Clora 2XP by acquiring two real-world samples: One VGO sample and one VLSFO sample. Both samples have been analyzed under repeatability conditions, defined here as 10 measurements obtained using 10 unique cups containing 10ml aliquots from a single sample container, analyzed by the same device, on the same day, in the same location, by the same operator.
For this experiment, Clora 2XP has been calibrated with a mineral oil calibration standard set that includes the following data points: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, and 10 mg/kg. Both the VGO and the VLSFO samples have been heated to 50°C/122°F in a warm water bath, which is continuously kept at 50°C/122°F.
After heating, the samples were vigorously shaken horizontally for 10 seconds and then shaken again, this time vertically, for 10 seconds. After the first 20 seconds of shaking, the sample would then be inverted and shaken again – vertically for 10 seconds and then horizontally for 10 seconds; ensuring that the sample has been completely liquified and properly homogenized. In total, the sample has been shaken for 40 seconds: 10 seconds with the cap facing up, 10 seconds with the cap facing right, 10 seconds with the cap facing down, and finally, 10 seconds with the cap facing left. After this, each sample was poured into a standard XRF sample cup, sealed with Prolene film, and placed in the analyzer. Each sample was analyzed for 300 seconds with Clora 2XP’s sulfur correction feature enabled.
Table 1: Sample Information
Table 2: VGO Sample Results
Each measurement aliquot has been measured for 300 seconds with Clora 2XP’s automatic sulfur correction feature enabled.
Table 3: VLSFO Sample Results
Each measurement aliquot has been measured for 300 seconds with Clora 2XP’s automatic sulfur correction feature enabled.
Conclusion
Chlorine analysis continues to be an important measurement for refiners, producers, and laboratories around the world. Global trends to reduce chlorine in feedstocks, or to accurately determine the chlorine in a feedstock or product, highlight the need for a simple, fast, and accurate analysis solution. Based on the data presented herein, XOS’ Clora series provides a viable solution for such needs. Utilizing the most advanced optics technology, the Clora series delivers accurate measurements across various matrices such as hydrocarbons, biofuels, vegetable oils, animal fats, water and more without the need for complex sample preparations, acids, or gasses.
%20vs.%20XRF%20(D8252)%20for%20Ni%20and%20V.png?width=600&height=323&name=ASTM%20Crude%20Oil%20Proficiency%20Testing%20Program%20ICP%20(D5708B)%20vs.%20XRF%20(D8252)%20for%20Ni%20and%20V.png)
%20vs%20ICP%20(IP%20501%20%26%20IP%20621).png?width=600&height=323&name=Precision%20Comparison%20Case%20Study%20%E2%80%94%20Petra%20MAX%20(EDXRF%C2%AE)%20vs%20ICP%20(IP%20501%20%26%20IP%20621).png)
